One thing is assured; in Indian polity leaders enjoying
the power are perceived as corrupt who jeopardize national interests for their
own selfish motives. Whereas those in the opposition are committed
nationalists, they don’t give way to the anti-proletarian opportunists.
Interestingly this outlook overwhelms the confines of party politics. Sometimes
I feel that the opinion on the issues is pre-conscripted for the government and
opposition flanks. Thus, their views are not being guided by their own
intrinsic judgment or party philosophies but by being in the government or
opposition.
Recently the issues like women security, FDI, land
acquisition bill, border disputes, and release of separatist leader have been
dealt in the said manner. When in opposition the politicians observe these
issues as atrocious, anti-nationalist that demean indigenous competence. However,
being in the government same subjects are perceived as inevitable for nation’s
growth and silence is favored over others. This indifference has crept among
the masses, as they feel dejected when the people in government change but not
the governance. It seems the government and opposition have liaised to stage
the ideological friction only to fool the people and secure their vote bank.
The explanations in support and opposition lack the precision and a benefitting
to all approach.
Even after 67 years of independence our politicians have
failed to extricate the rajneeti from
satta. Where former objects at ‘the art or science of government or
governing, especially the governing of a political entity, such as nation, and
the administration and control of its internal and external affairs’ the
later emphases on the ‘activities aimed
at improving someone's status or increasing power within an organization.’
They are still mortgaging rajneeti
for satta.
No comments:
Post a Comment